False rape accuser

I don't know why this habitual false rape accuser is in such a whinning
mode...

If you are going to knowingly make false accusations, and completely ruin
the accused men's life with them, you better be prepared for the
consequences when the false accusations are exposed as well.

Instead, this woman is reported to be "devastated" and feel like the "whole
world fell apart"! For what? For her lies being exposed in the public? This
women's fake emotional devastation shows the state of arrogance and
complacency women have reached as a result of all the rape-sheild laws and
rape victim industry and sympathetic media toward alleged victims. These
women take it for granted that they can wantonly make false accusation about
rape, while their privacy and identity being tightly proteted by law, and if
lucky get huge settlments award or benefits from the government. They come
to forget that lieing is bad, especially the ones that are done with a
malicious intent to ruin innocent people's entire life. They have also
become unaccostomed to the fact that one has take responsibility for their
own acts. Oh, but this "poor' women was abe to get none of these "benefits"
because her lie was exposed and now she is utterly "shock"ed...my sympathy
goes to her......

Or is it just another way of her continuing to cling to her beloved "victim"
status? Now that her initial claim of being victim of rape no longer does
the trick of duping the public, she changed her tactic to play some feeble,
sensitive woman who is "devastated" by such heinous act as exposing a lie in
public...

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

"Gender-specific" law

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/F/FOR_MEN_ONLY?SITE=NYONE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

If the exposure law in California is considered to be gender specific since
the reference in the law is masculine "his", then I think the original
provisions in the Constitution for the eligibility to run for the US
President and other political seats are also gender specific, no? and of
course, All "men" are created equall......

bye bye, Hillary and what are all these women doing in the Capitol Hill?

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

High heel as instrument of oppression Part 2

Follow-up to yesterday's entry...

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20639690-5006029,00.html

if women are subjected to oppresive dress code, why don't they just buy
shoes that doesn't have high heels? We are told that women now make
somewhere between 80 percent or more of all purchase dicisions (doens't Pru
want to investigate into this "inequality"?), and with all the money they
have at their disposal, and they still cannot stay away from high heels?
How deeply entrenched the oppresive western dress code for women are!

Why so many high heels are still on market, many of which actually being
designed by felow women? Are they co-conspirator in men's oppression of
women? if high heel is considered to be oppressive tool against women, and
since we live in a world where issues affecting women receives the UTMOST
(and only) IMPORTANCE, why don't Pru take one step ahead and lead the
banning of sale of any shoes for women taht have heels higher than, say, one
inch? - with imposition of penalty to departments and stores that carry high
heels and throw the owners into jail (if they are men of course)

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Stephen Hawking vs. gender feminists

How would card-carrying feminists and women`s organization react to the domestic violence that Professor Hawking has suffered for over a decade? It should be one or the combination of the following;

1. Professor Hawking made her do it.

2. Patriarchical society made her do it.

3. Men deserve it, simply because they are men.

4. Because Professor Hawking didn`t share half of the housework. If it`s in Spain, he would have been criminally prosecuted under the new law.

5. The abuses that Elain, the (former) wife of professor Hawking suffered when she was a kid, or from her previous marriage made her do it. (The Dailymail can come with one instantly, if necessary.)

6. male-dominated mass media cooked up and perpetuated the story.

And to be followed by screaming for more women-only DV shelter and empowering legislation….

High heels as an instrument of oppression

Australia`s cabinet minister still in mold of 60`s bra-burning feminists・she said that western women are “subjected to oppressive dress code” by “torturing” feet with high heels"... then why don`t enlightened western women simply not wear them and wear instead running shoes or sandal or whatever you like? (in fact many women wear sandals and other very relaxing shoes at offices, while men`s choice is still mostly limited to dress shoes) With all the education and money and title western women have acquired over the years through affirmative actions, gender quotas and litigations, etc, are they still unable to choose their own shoes? Or do we need some new laws or governmental agencies regulating what kind of shoes women should wear?


Husband's opinion infuriates Goward
Email Print Normal font Large font Sarah Smiles, Canberra
October 23, 2006

Israeli president

The biggest headline-grabbing opportunity for sexual harassment industry is unfolding...

I do not know if ever the head of state was accused of sexual harassment (except Clinton for whom the industry made miraculous about-face and went for all-out defense for him).

The bigger the fish, the bigger the publicity effect for your agenda. Charge against one low or middle ranking military officer wouldn`t get any media attention and simply become part of statistics, a charge against the head of states, however ceremonious the post may be in Israel, is a slum dunk for the sexual harassment industry.

In addition to the publicity effect, it could lend voice to somewhat self-serving argument made in some quarters of feminist groups that those high level post should be filled by a woman, not a man, because; a woman in high position, almost by definition if you take the industry`s version of it, is immune from such vague yet devastating charges.

And as Israel has been following the example of the United States who opted to go for a “kindler, gentler military” with more positions close to combat opening up for women and more gender-norming in training and operation being made mandatory, no wonder the Israel military had difficulty defeating Hizbollah? With the overwhelming dominance of its military might over any other nation in the world, the United States can placate the gender feminsts by going “kindler, gentler military” to some extent without much real disadvantage, Israel, who is surrounded by hostile nations with large standing armies and whose margins of military superiority to others is nowhere close to that the United States enjoys, doing the same could prove devastating for them.

Nobel (Women) Peace Prize

Quite an interesting piece by the Economist・

Actually I thought this year a lesbian woman will be given the prize, not that there is many internationally recognizable lesbian who is worthy of the prize, (is this Bangladesh man worthy of prize?-I tend to agree with the Economist), I`m sure there are hundreds of lesbian activists fighting for LGBT rights or other worthy liberal causes, and some of them maybe even as famous as the Bangladesh man ・before the announcement of prize, that is, of course. But it is because since Iranian woman got the prize in 2003 (the first “Arab woman” to receive the prize), and in 2004 (the first “African woman”, so for 2006 my bet was on first “lesbian woman” since the Norwegian committee that decides who get the Nobel Peace Prize is predictably very much politically invested in “diversity”.

In the 21 st century, no white man was given the prize with the exception of Jimmy Carter in 2002, for taking a snub at US President George W. Bush, a man whom the Nobel committee, just like lift-wingers in the United States, hates the most in the world. Moreover, in the recent 4 years since 2003, with the exception of 2005 when the award was given to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), (the only year in recent memory when the award was given to people/institution that genuinely contributed to peace in its original sense in my opinion), all the award is related to women ・that is either the winners were women or the activities that won him the prize were almost entirely targeted to women, or to “empower” women (96 percent of the microcredit were loaned to women)

As you can see from the list of recent winners, the Nobel committee is increasingly expanding the definition of peace, from the traditional concept of peace to a more progressive concept of peace that includes such concepts as environment protection, sustainable development and human rights. While it may benefit thousands of NGOs and activists in further advancing their noble causes, it also encourages the expectations of the “Buggin`s turn” not only on the continental rotation (as the Economist pointed out), but also of the rotation by various noble lefty causes or ethnic/demographic groups (Arab woman - African woman - what kind of woman will be next?).

Sore loser...

Sore loser….losers are always sore, whether it is a man or woman. Latvia`s president who ran for the top job at the United Nations, whose sole strength was based on the fact that she was a woman, lost her bid for the next Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Predictably, she is blaming her loss on the old-boy network, although polished diplomats from 15 countries that form the Security Council discussing the candidate for the next Secretary-General bears hardly any semblance to what people usually think of when they hear the much-cited-but-never-proven phrase “old-boy network” But it doesn`t matter as long as the Latvian loser and feminists could grab headlines with this sound-bite.

No, it`s Russia and China, stupid・ For geopolitical and historical reasons, these two countries were not going to vote for this woman anyway. If you cannot figure out this kind of most basic world politics 101, you are definitely not up to the task of the Secretary-General. I don`t know why a woman with this kind of infantile understanding of world politics rose to the top post in Latvia, -Latvians should awaken to this fact and some reflections may be needed on having such feminist-mouthpiece as the head of own State. Vaira, maybe my grandmother is more suited for the post than you are, as at least she doesn`t suffer from peculiar feminists` symptom, or what I call patriarchy conspiracy theory paranoia. And, oh, she is a woman. So, according to you Vaira, she passes the most important litmus test for the next Secretary-General.