Saturday, January 21, 2006

Of sexual harassment and gender discrimination

It’s good to see that there is still a man with common sense, uninfected by politically correct virus, is writing pieces for Newsweek, a kind of news magazine which routinely put up advocacy articles and special cover stories to promote various feminists’ agenda (do anyone still remember “When women lead?” ?)

The author’s view on the recent spate of crackdowns by the Wall Street firms on the use of adult-entertainment facility by its employees is a result of PC hysteria. It is true. But there is more to it. Such allegations and lawsuits on sexual harassment and gender discrimination is not really about harassment or discrimination, it is about women getting back at big companies, which they see as a symbol of patriarchy and male power. The gender feminists ideology posits that such male dominated institution must be weakened, disbanded and replaced by female-dominated institution, to achieve true gender “equality” (yeah, of course). In their eternal quest for power, control and money, lawsuits, or threat to bring lawsuits, are the quickest, easiest and most effective way to redistribute millions or billions of money from company (male domain) to women employee and female lawyers who specialize in this area, and any foundation or NGO or whatever they set up with the payoff money to promote agenda (female domain), and oust male execs from their position and fill in the position with one of their cohorts (how difficult it would be for companies to replace the man just fired for sexual harassment with yet another man?). This is the quickest way to correct the so-called “gender wage gap” and increase the percentage of women in executive positions, the two top priorities for feminists and women executives, far more important than creating profits for company they work for or for the US economy as a whole. Of course it is the fastest way because you don’t need to actually work hard and produce results which they seem to be most reluctant to do or largely incapable of doing, but you just need to whine in the court or to the media and who are more than willing to take up your case. This is why they just can’t stop bringing lawsuits and no matter how much companies bend over backward to create PC workplace, feminists will keep inventing new kind of discrimination, new kinds of harassment, so that they can continue this cycle of redistribution of power and money through litigation. They will keep honing their sensitivity so that their sexual harassment/discrimination antenna can pick up the most subtle hint of sexual connotation and turn it into multi million/billon dollar sexual harassment/discrimination lawsuit.

I hope that the author can continue to write articles like this one for Newsweek. That is, I hope that he can withstand the avalanche of e-mails (hate-mail) and other more direct or subtle organized harassment campaign by gender feminists this author will most likely face as a result of publishing this article.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Why Business in strip clubs? Men always look at it as a feminist rebellion. When women do not agree with business being conducted in strip clubs, why do men always look an it as "oh, women are just trying to get back at men" or “playing the sexual discrimination ploy". It actually has nothing at all to do with that. It is simply - Why go to a strip club? Why not golf, sports, cocktails, dinner! Why bring adultery into business. Why not just go to a hore house, it is the same thing.The main job of strippers/hores is to decieve, to cause a temptation, an illusion. It is plain and simple, it is adultery. It is not a feminist act against men. It is an act agianst the women who take our men. The more men look at other women with lust, the farther your women at home will be from you. Why not concentrate on satisfying your women at home base and you would be surprised at what the return will be. Women just require attention. When men look onto others or elsewhere, the bond is lost. Whether it is because Men feel that they don’t get what they need at home or whatever is all a big excuse not to be faithful. All women want is faithfulness, and full devotion from a man and the world will be at your feet. The issue of discrimination and harassment is- yes, it is discrimination to ALL (not just women) Yes, it is sexual harassment; it is strippers harassing and tempting people to be unfaithful. Do you want to condone unfaithfulness, deception, greed, in your business? This is what you are promoting by conducting business in a strip club. It is not like going to a baseball game, or dinner party that is just a big excuse by men to go to look at strippers. Bottom line- strip clubs, hore houses, Hooters, whatever the place may be, it is not appropriate to conduct a business there.
TRUTH - This is not just my opinion, this is fact. I myself am an ex-stripper; I know the reasons why men and women come to strip clubs. I know first hand why dancers are there, I know why they do it, sure it's great money, but it's not why they dance and strip for entertainment - it is for attention. Believe it or not, these women/men actually have low self-esteem. They have to do this to make themselves feel like they are somebody, like they matter in this world. Not that this mattes at all to those who go to partake in this deception, but maybe everyone should stand back and look at the whole picture. Men- stop making this an excuse of sexual harassment and discrimination and feminist rebellion when women do not agree with strip clubs. You would be surprised at how many women love to look and enjoy other women. You would also be surprised if you open your eyes and soul and pay attention to your wife’s, girlfriends, lovers - you will be satisfied beyond your wildest dreams. If not, then you are with the wrong person. Just give it a true try. It is that it is not appropriate to mix business with sexual pleasure. Try another pleasure in business.