Here go again the Marxist feminist・
So Hillary Clinton again devotes her taxpayer-funded working hours (although she is paid only 77% of what Obama is paid, of course) in proposing to create a matriarchal totalitarian state that checks every paycheck of its citizens with a view to achieving complete statistical parity of earnings between men and women. I always wonder, if she could expend even only one tenth of those times and energy to check and give some serious thoughts about the pay statistics she proudly cites as evidence of sexism in the society, would she be still saying the same thing....?
Just consider these simple questions...
If companies could get away with paying to women only 77% of what it pays to men, then wouldn't all companies be rushing to hire only women...?
Do you (Hillary) seriously believe that you are getting paid 77 % of fellow male Senators?
If so, I give up (you are hopeless - maybe your obsession with gender pay equity and paranoia of living in patriarchal society has taken away from you any common sense)
If not, think the following;
Let's say that if public sector do not discriminate (even the most militant feminist would not believe that public sector discriminates sexes on pay - or would they believe?), then all the pay gaps must be coming from private sectors, which means that pay gap in that sector should be wider that the alleged 77 % - should be 66%, after adjustment. (According to data from the Census 2000 Supplementary Survey show, 14 percent of the country's workforce reported that they were government employees at the local, state, or federal level (about 18 million people).) Do you still believe in the so-called "pay gap"?
Well if you look back a little in history, the fake, cooked-up "pay gap" controversy has been around for decades - those mathematically-challenged feminists believed in the past such make-belief figure as 57 %... No wonder there are not enough mathematicians and engineer PhDs at Harvard and other top universities!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment